• Sheriff's tipline
  • Leslie Williams
  • Faith-Ingle-Smith 1
  • Faith-Ingle-Smith 2
  • Faith-Ingle-Smith 3
Sun, Oct 26, 2014 04:28 AM
Issue of October 22, 2014
Email Link

Public access should be protected

My Opinion

March 05, 2014 | 10:52 AM

It was a year ago that I wrote about a couple of proposed bills that would have threatened the public's easy access to information by allowing government units to place public notices on the Internet instead of in their local newspapers. While those bills went nowhere, similar pieces of legislation have been introduced this session.

Question of the Week
Do you rely on your local newspaper for information about where your tax money goes?
This time, unfortunately, the public may not be as fortunate. The proposed legislation — Senate Bill 367 by a 44-4 vote and House Bill 1266 by an 82-12 vote — easily cleared their originating chamber.

SB 367 (authored by State Sen. Brandt Hershman, R-Buck Creek) and HB 1266 (authored by State Rep. Dan Leonard, R-Huntington) include language that would no longer require local governments to publish proposed budgets as part of the notice of the budget hearing. Such hearings are vital because they provide the public an opportunity to address concerns they have about the proposed budget and tax rates.

Without easy access to the proposed budgets, it is difficult for residents to raise concerns. Let's hope that isn't the point. Yet, at a time when the public's trust of government is at a low, is it a good idea for government to become less transparent?

Yes, public notices can be put on the Internet, but, as I wrote a year ago, when a House bill co-authored by Harrison County's Rhonda Rhoads would have removed the requirement that school corporations must publish an annual financial report, the question isn't whether that information would be accessible. The question is, would it be easily accessible.

For many, the answer would be no.

Because of work schedules and other demands, not everybody can drive to the school administration office or courthouse to get a copy of the proposed budget. Plus, while more people have Internet service than ever before, not everyone does. They may live in an area where it isn't available, cannot afford it (after all, the state's unemployment rate, according to the Indiana Dept. of Workforce Development, still stood at 6.9 percent in December), or simply don't want it.

Yes, those people can use the computers at the public library, but, again, work schedules, family demands and finances may prevent them from doing so easily. If you doubt that there are people who can't even afford the gas it would take, stop by one of our area food banks sometime.

Many of the government meetings we cover are not heavily attended. It is not because people don't care about what is going on. Instead, it is because they are busy with life: working, spending time with their children, going to class and volunteering with various groups. They rely on us — their newspaper — to catch them up on what they missed.

However, even if they didn't care about what is happening in their community, that doesn't change the fact that information published in public notices — information that lawmakers long ago deemed important — should be easily accessible.

In most issues, we give our local state lawmakers space to update their constituents on important matters. We are glad to do so. However, if they believe those updates are valuable enough that they should be easily accessible in the local newspaper, shouldn't the details of a proposed budget and other information currently published in public notices be just as accessible?

Be sure to tell your local state lawmakers that the next time you see them. Better yet, give them a call. To reach members of the House of Representatives, call 1-812-232-9600 or toll-free 1-800-382-9841. For members of the State Senate, call 1-317-232-9400 or toll-free 1-800-382-9467.

  1. print email
    Less Profit For Newspapers
    March 06, 2014 | 09:56 AM

    This is about saving taxpayers the cost of paying newspapers lots of money to publish reports in papers that most people do not subscribe to. The law does not prevent the papers from publishing the reports as news. How about putting a box outside at the school with the reports so people can pick it up 24/7. That would be easy access and a whole lot cheaper! This is really all about the newspapers losing money and not easy access.

  2. print email
    This is anti-newspaper legislation
    March 06, 2014 | 01:08 PM

    The fact of the matter is, unless a report comes from FOX News, many people don't believe it. And the people who feel that way also realize that the best way to silence other media outlets is to discontinue their revenue stream. I've spoken with several folks who tell me they are "protesting" the "liberal media" by no longer subscribing to the Courier-Journal or by purchasing the Corydon Democrat...yet ironically, these same people have no problem with accessing content from these newspapers on the internet. [In all fairness, I no longer subscribe to the C-J...but that's all about the price of a subscription, and not about the content.]

    So these folks can call it what they want...but it's a thinly-veiled attempt to punish and strangle the news sources they believe to be liberal, and public access to governmental budget information is not their actual concern. Let's call a spade a spade here.

Schuler Bauer Real Estate
Alberto's Italian Restaurant
Barbara Shaw
Debby Broughton
Best Built
Riggs Towing
Corydon Instant Print

Corydon Democrat, 301 N. Capitol Ave., Corydon, IN 47112 • 1-812-738-2211 • email