image
  • Faith-Ingle-Smith 2
  • Faith-Ingle-Smith 3
  • Leslie Williams
  • Faith-Ingle-Smith 1
  • Sheriff's tipline
Tue, Sep 23, 2014 08:19 AM
Issue of September 17, 2014
print
Print
email
Email Link
Comment
Feedback
share
Share

It's time for an intervention


My Opinion


October 16, 2013 | 10:01 AM

The American public has lost patience with Washington. The question is, now what?

Congress is unable to do its job. It displays neither competence nor responsibility. It lurches, reeling from crisis to crisis, each one self-manufactured in an effort to postpone the reckoning from some earlier crisis. It shut the government down over a temporary budget. Now, it's threatening the financial credibility of the U.S. government and the security and safety of the American people. Three years of last-minute spending decisions have culminated in a television standoff with no actual negotiations.

Question of the Week
Do you see members of Congress doing any good for the country?
shadow
Too many members of Congress reject the notion that accommodation and time-honored procedures allow them to fulfill their responsibilities to the American people. They use their legislative skill to engage in brinksmanship rather than address the country's fundamental problems. Economic growth? Creating jobs? Putting the federal budget on a sustainable path? Don't look to Congress. They're too busy coming up with the next short-term tactic to confront the other side. Every day they dither, they keep the government from addressing the nation's real problems.

Even worse, they've managed to raise real questions in this country and abroad about whether our system of government can work. Are we saddled with a national legislature paralyzed by unending conflict? Are we capable of tackling our major problems? We are on the road to a government that cannot plan, a country shackled by perpetual uncertainty, and a loss of faith in our institutions both at home and abroad.

We do not have to continue down that road, but we do have to confront a core problem. The political center in Congress has weakened to the point of ineffectiveness, if not near-irrelevance.

That's fine with some people in Washington, who are comfortable with gridlock and don't think its consequences will be dire. Our government's inability to deal with problems, they argue, is good; a government that's able to act, they believe, creates more problems than it solves.

Likewise, some people acknowledge polarization as a problem but blame it on an electorate that prefers a divided government, split between the parties. All I can say is that divided government in the past — think Ronald Reagan and Tip O'Neill — didn't keep Congress from creatively addressing national challenges. Divided government is not easy, but it is not unusual and it can work.

Politicians don't deserve all the blame. Voters share responsibility: more people have to turn out to vote. The more people who vote, the better the chances to strengthen the political center, that is, moderates and pragmatists. That's because low turnout brings out the most ideologically intense voters, who, in turn, reward the most polarizing candidates. A Congress more representative of the American people rests on expanding efforts to convince people to vote and beating back the barriers to voting.

The second solution lies with members of Congress. Contemplating a government shutdown, a Kentucky congressman recently explained his stance by saying, "All that really matters is what my district wants." This is not an uncommon view, but it's a distressingly limited one. Our system depends on members who believe it's also their responsibility to lead and inform voters, who are willing to weigh the national interest as well as parochial concerns and who have confidence in our system to resolve political differences.

In other words, we need members of Congress devoted to making the system work. We need men and women in office who understand that, when the voters give us a divided government, they have no choice but to accept the distribution of power and work with it, regardless of what they wish were the case. We need legislators who realize that those on the other side feel just as passionately and deserve their respect and who are committed to finding a solution to our problems.

We change laws in our democracy and solve our most difficult issues in this country not by bringing government to a halt, but by fighting out the issues before the voters in an election. At the end of the day, we have to move the country forward and we need to elect members of Congress who are willing and able to do that.

Lee Hamilton is director of the Center on Congress at Indiana University. He was a member of the U.S. House of Representatives for 34 years.

  1. print email
    Lee Hamilton's letter
    October 17, 2013 | 12:02 PM

    Well said, Congressman Hamilton, one of the few Democrats I ever voted for. You are sorely missed in our Congress.


    Francis Hughes
  2. print email
    WWE at its finest.....
    October 17, 2013 | 01:05 PM

    To bad its National Selection not National Election. They tell us who our choices are. Too bad they end up working for the same global corporate international banking royal elite that controls the world. If you think this is not true then what is the Federal Reserve, IMF, World Bank, Trilateral Commission, Etc. They just make it seem like they are "in talks". They knew what the outcome was going to be. If you really belief in the system how it is now then Vince McMan has a product to sell you.

Schuler Bauer Real Estate
Schwartz Family Restaurant
Best Built
Debby Broughton
Alberto's Italian Restaurant
Barbara Shaw
Corydon Instant Print
S M T W T F S

123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930



Corydon Democrat, 301 N. Capitol Ave., Corydon, IN 47112 1-812-738-2211 email